"Mohammad Al-Bakhiti," a member of the political bureau of the Yemeni Ansarullah movement, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive ceasefire on all fronts, warned that excluding Lebanon from this process is unacceptable and Sanaa is still on alert.
Publish dateThursday 9 April 2026 - 10:54
Story Code : 350401
Afghan Voice Agency (AVA): A member of the political bureau of the Ansarullah movement, in a clear position that reflects the resistance's perspective on the current confrontation process, emphasized that any ceasefire agreement must be comprehensive and include all fronts.
He warned that excluding the Lebanese front is a clear violation of previous agreements and promises the collapse of understandings and a return to an escalation of conflicts.
In an interview with Al-Ahed News Agency, Al-Bakhiti emphasized that what is happening in Lebanon contradicts what was previously agreed upon. The plans presented, both by the Islamic Republic of Iran and within the framework of international negotiations, were based on the principle of unity of fronts, and this issue has also been communicated to the Americans themselves.
This Ansarullah official also said in an interview with Sputnik that “the trigger is on and any violation on any front is a violation of the ceasefire, and Ansarullah continues to adhere to the unity of fronts.”
He emphasized that international mediators must oblige the United States to observe the ceasefire in Lebanon, otherwise, this means that no agreement has been reached in principle.
A member of the Ansarullah political bureau told Al-Ahed: “The attempt to separate the Lebanese front from other fronts of confrontation shows a clear contradiction in the US position and confirms the enemy’s state of confusion.”
Al-Bakhiti emphasized that the axis of resistance is reviewing the current situation in light of these developments. Continuing aggression against Lebanon would mean in practice the collapse of the ceasefire agreement and the transition to a new phase of open confrontation against all odds.
Regarding Yemen’s position, Al-Bakhiti reiterated that Sanaa is committed to standing by any Arab or Islamic country that is subjected to aggression by the US or Israel. He explained that this position is no longer theoretical, but has been practically proven through field support for various resistance fronts, whether in Palestine, Lebanon or Iran.
He clarified that Yemen’s response will be based on a measured ascending phase that includes multiple power cards, including the Red Sea front, and warned that any further escalation will be met with greater escalation.
Al-Bakhiti called on the US to force Israel to cease fire, stressing that failure in this regard would lead to an expansion of the war in a way that would not benefit Washington and Tel Aviv.
He noted that the enemy is trying to use the time to gain maximum benefits before any real commitment to the agreement. Washington is sending contradictory signals; on the one hand, it talks about the agreement, while on the other, it excludes some fronts.
Al-Bakhiti considered this behavior to indicate that America is not a trustworthy party, adding that the axis of resistance deals with field realities, not political statements.
Al-Bakhiti concluded by sending a message to the Lebanese people, especially the Islamic resistance, saying that the option of confrontation was a natural consequence of the continued Israeli violations and the inability of the international community to impose adherence to the agreement, and he believes that the great sacrifices being made in Lebanon, Palestine and other fields of confrontation will not be in vain, but will lead to a definitive victory.
He warned that excluding the Lebanese front is a clear violation of previous agreements and promises the collapse of understandings and a return to an escalation of conflicts.
In an interview with Al-Ahed News Agency, Al-Bakhiti emphasized that what is happening in Lebanon contradicts what was previously agreed upon. The plans presented, both by the Islamic Republic of Iran and within the framework of international negotiations, were based on the principle of unity of fronts, and this issue has also been communicated to the Americans themselves.
This Ansarullah official also said in an interview with Sputnik that “the trigger is on and any violation on any front is a violation of the ceasefire, and Ansarullah continues to adhere to the unity of fronts.”
He emphasized that international mediators must oblige the United States to observe the ceasefire in Lebanon, otherwise, this means that no agreement has been reached in principle.
A member of the Ansarullah political bureau told Al-Ahed: “The attempt to separate the Lebanese front from other fronts of confrontation shows a clear contradiction in the US position and confirms the enemy’s state of confusion.”
Al-Bakhiti emphasized that the axis of resistance is reviewing the current situation in light of these developments. Continuing aggression against Lebanon would mean in practice the collapse of the ceasefire agreement and the transition to a new phase of open confrontation against all odds.
Regarding Yemen’s position, Al-Bakhiti reiterated that Sanaa is committed to standing by any Arab or Islamic country that is subjected to aggression by the US or Israel. He explained that this position is no longer theoretical, but has been practically proven through field support for various resistance fronts, whether in Palestine, Lebanon or Iran.
He clarified that Yemen’s response will be based on a measured ascending phase that includes multiple power cards, including the Red Sea front, and warned that any further escalation will be met with greater escalation.
Al-Bakhiti called on the US to force Israel to cease fire, stressing that failure in this regard would lead to an expansion of the war in a way that would not benefit Washington and Tel Aviv.
He noted that the enemy is trying to use the time to gain maximum benefits before any real commitment to the agreement. Washington is sending contradictory signals; on the one hand, it talks about the agreement, while on the other, it excludes some fronts.
Al-Bakhiti considered this behavior to indicate that America is not a trustworthy party, adding that the axis of resistance deals with field realities, not political statements.
Al-Bakhiti concluded by sending a message to the Lebanese people, especially the Islamic resistance, saying that the option of confrontation was a natural consequence of the continued Israeli violations and the inability of the international community to impose adherence to the agreement, and he believes that the great sacrifices being made in Lebanon, Palestine and other fields of confrontation will not be in vain, but will lead to a definitive victory.
avapress.net/vdccxxq1s2bqp08.-ya2.html
Top hits
